Psikoedukasi Berbasis Infografis untuk Meningkatkan Kesadaran Etis Mahasiswa dalam Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69930/scitec.v3i2.789Keywords:
Psikoedukasi; Etika Penggunaan AI; Kesadaran Mahasiswa; Integritas Akademik; Literasi AIAbstract
Psikoedukasi berbasis infografis digital ini bertujuan meningkatkan kesadaran mahasiswa dalam menggunakan artificial intelligence (AI) secara etis, kritis, transparan, dan bertanggung jawab dalam aktivitas akademik. Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini dilaksanakan melalui penyusunan dan penyebaran infografis digital melalui media sosial Instagram Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Negeri Makassar. Sasaran utama kegiatan adalah mahasiswa sebagai bagian dari civitas akademika Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Negeri Makassar. Data awal diperoleh melalui survei terhadap 53 mahasiswa Psikologi, sedangkan evaluasi pascakegiatan diisi oleh 35 mahasiswa yang telah mengakses infografis dan bersedia mengisi evaluasi. Materi psikoedukasi mencakup pengertian AI, pola penggunaan AI dalam pengerjaan tugas, integritas akademik, transparansi, tanggung jawab, privasi data, bias, misinformasi, serta pentingnya menempatkan AI sebagai alat bantu belajar, bukan pengganti proses berpikir. Hasil survei awal menunjukkan bahwa 96% mahasiswa menggunakan AI untuk mengerjakan tugas akademik. Di antara pengguna AI, 55% menggunakan AI untuk sebagian besar tugas, sedangkan 4% menggunakan AI secara penuh tanpa melakukan penyuntingan. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan respons positif terhadap media psikoedukasi. Infografis dinilai sangat menarik oleh sebagian besar peserta, materi dinilai sangat mudah dipahami, dan informasi yang disampaikan membantu peserta merefleksikan kembali persepsi mereka terhadap etika penggunaan AI. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa psikoedukasi berbasis infografis digital dapat menjadi strategi awal yang mudah diakses untuk memperkuat kesadaran etis mahasiswa dalam penggunaan AI. Program lanjutan berupa diskusi interaktif, penyusunan pedoman institusional, dan pelatihan integritas akademik direkomendasikan agar kesadaran etis dapat berkembang menjadi kebiasaan akademik yang bertanggung jawab.
Downloads
References
Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Bali, M., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C. M., Romero-Hall, E., Koutropoulos, A., ... Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53–130.
Brown, N. W. (2018). Psychoeducational groups: Process and practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Ben Saad, H. (2024). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 41(2), 1–7.
Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. (2024). Panduan penggunaan generative artificial intelligence pada pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2016). Getting graphic about infographics: Design lessons learned from popular infographics. Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2016.1205832
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ... Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111109
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Lukens, E. P., & McFarlane, W. R. (2004). Psychoeducation as evidence-based practice: Considerations for practice, research, and policy. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4(3), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhh019
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), 07. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andi Fitri Wahyuni, Ahmad Ridfah, Rezky Eka Wardana, Novi Yanti Pratiwi, Andi Nahliah Bungawali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
