Implementation of the Principle of Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedas Towards Cases of Transboundary Haze Pollution in the Southeast Asian Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69930/ajer.v3i2.682Keywords:
Transboundary Haze Pollution; International Environmental Law; Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedas; State Responsibility; ASEANAbstract
Forest and land fires in Indonesia have repeatedly caused transboundary haze pollution that affects several Southeast Asian countries, particularly Malaysia, Singapore, and Brunei Darussalam. This situation raises an important question of state responsibility under international environmental law, especially through the principle of sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas, which requires states to use their territory and natural resources in a manner that does not cause harm to other states. This principle is reflected in the 1972 Stockholm Declaration, the 1992 Rio Declaration, and the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution, which provides a regional framework for preventing and controlling transboundary haze. This study uses normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches to examine how the principle operates in the context of transboundary haze pollution in Southeast Asia. The analysis shows that the implementation of this principle requires states to exercise due diligence through prevention, monitoring, law enforcement, and regional cooperation. However, its effectiveness remains constrained by weak environmental enforcement, limited compliance mechanisms under ASEAN, and the persistence of the non-interference principle in regional governance. Strengthening the implementation of sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas is therefore essential not only for state accountability, but also for protecting regional ecosystems, reducing greenhouse gas emissions from forest and land fires, supporting climate change mitigation, and advancing environmental justice and regional public health in Southeast Asia.
References
1. Singh S. Forest fire emissions: A contribution to global climate change. Front For Glob Chang [Internet]. 2022;5:925480. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/forests-and-global-change/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2022.925480/full
2. Jameaba MS. Forest and Land Fire Management in Indonesia: Can the Past Provide much Needed Lessons for the Future? Available SSRN 4898684. 2024;
3. Fang T, Gu Y, Yim SHL. Assessing local and transboundary fine particulate matter pollution and sectoral contributions in Southeast Asia during haze months of 2015–2019. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2024;912:169051. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969723076817
4. Dong F, Wang Y, Su B, Hua Y, Zhang Y. The process of peak CO2 emissions in developed economies: A perspective of industrialization and urbanization. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;141:61–75.
5. Alam S, Al Faruque A. From sovereignty to self-determination: emergence of collective rights of indigenous peoples in natural resources management. Geo Envtl L Rev. 2019;32:59.
6. Vinata R, Pohan IA. The Significance of State Practises in Enforcing the Principle of Effectiveness in Claims of Territorial Ownership. Justitia J Huk [Internet]. 2023;7(2). Available from: https://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/Justitia/article/view/20410
7. Atapattu S. Emergence of International Environmental Law: A Brief History from the Stockholm Conference to Agenda 2030. In: The Environment Through the Lens of International Courts and Tribunals [Internet]. Springer; 2022. p. 1–33. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-6265-507-2_1
8. Baste IA, Watson RT. Tackling the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies by making peace with nature 50 years after the Stockholm Conference. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. 2022;73:102466. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378022000048
9. Kumala MT, Vinata RT. Government Collaboration Model in Plastic Waste Management as an Effort to Protect Indonesia’s Marine Environment. Lex Portus [Internet]. 2025;11(3):25. Available from: https://lexportus.net.ua/vipusk-3-2025/vinata_1132.pdf
10. Bratspies R. “ In Countless Ways and on an Unprecedented Scale”: Reflections on the Stockholm Declaration at 50. Ga J Int’l Comp L. 2021;50:754.
11. Dominiak Ł. Libertarianism, Conjoined Twins, and the Sic Utere Tuo Rule: A Response to Wollen, Block, Nowakowski, Slenzok and Wójtowicz. Philosophia (Mendoza). 2025;53(3):1211–23.
12. Sitompul MIK. Prevention of forest fires in Indonesia: evaluation of international and regional legal frameworks. UC Libr Univ Canterbury. 2021;
13. Sari DAA, Triatmodjo M, Purwanto H. Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedas: State Responsibility and Environmental Obligations in the Context of Climate Change. Yustisia. 14(1):111–25.
14. Pimonkorn P. Environmental Impact Assessment as customary international law in ASEAN region: Some legal issues. Environ Policy Law. 2025;55(1):26–37.
15. Lemke J. The Protection of Community Interests in the International Law of State Responsibility: Insights from Rational Choice Theory. Springer Nature; 2025.
16. Peters A, Krieger H, Kreuzer L. Due diligence: the risky risk management tool in international law. Cambridge Int Law J. 2020;9(2):121–36.
17. Muhammad F. Environmental agreement under the non-interference principle: The case of ASEAN agreement on transboundary haze pollution. Int Environ Agreements Polit Law Econ. 2022;22(1):139–55.
18. Fitriyanti F, Gunawan Y. Post-Asean Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution: How to Settle the Dispute Settlement? Hasanuddin Law Rev. 2025;5(3):253–65.
19. Rimbawati DR, Vinata RT. Legal Analysis of Marine Environmental Protection from Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Asian J Environ Res [Internet]. 2026;3(1). Available from: https://journal.scitechgrup.com/index.php/ajer/article/view/679
20. Abdurrahaman AY, Edward-Ekpo CF. Balancing the State and Transnational Corporate Responsibility in the Protection of Transboundary Air Pollution. Bus Hum Rights Law Policy. 2025;1(1):1–18.
21. Luekitinan P. The Asymmetry of ASEAN Law: Unsustainable Development Phenomenon of Transformative State Enterprise in Case of Cross-border Power Plant Projects. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2024. p. 12040.
22. Miller RA. Pandemic as Transboundary Harm: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration. NYUJ Int’l L Pol. 2022;55:259.
23. Rizky FK, Suhaidi S, Syahrin A, Leviza J. State’s Responsibility over Forest and Land Fires Causing Transboundary Haze Pollution in the Frame of ASEAN Agreement. Jambe Law J. 2020;3(1):65–81.
24. Alicia FR. Implementation of environmental pollution and damage prevention instruments in indonesia: Issues and challenges. Indones J Environ Law Sustain Dev. 2024;3(1):125–56.
25. Yogar HNA. The Responsibility Of Indonesia Towards Transboundary Haze Pollution After The AATHP Ratification. Eur Proc Soc Behav Sci.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ilham Aldi Nugroho, Ria Tri Vinata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
