Legal Analysis of Marine Environmental Protection from Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Authors

  • Dianti Reres Rimbawati Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2689-9280
  • Ria Tri Vinata Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69930/ajer.v3i1.679

Keywords:

marine environment, GHG emissions, blue carbon, anthropogenic, state responsibility

Abstract

Climate change due to drastic increases in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has damaged marine ecosystems through warming and acidification. This study aims to analyze the conformity of international law and the implementation of Indonesian national regulations in an effort to protect the marine environment from the impacts of anthropogenic GHG emissions. Using normative legal research methods, this study applies legislative and conceptual approaches to examine UNCLOS 1982, the Paris Agreement, the Environmental Management Law, and Presidential Regulation No. 110 of 2025. The results show that Article 192 of UNCLOS 1982 is now interpreted as a due diligence obligation that requires states to make maximum efforts to prevent marine pollution, including emissions released into the atmosphere. At the national level, Indonesia has made significant reforms through Presidential Regulation No. 110 of 2025 which allows for accelerated carbon trading without having to wait for the achievement of NDC targets. In addition, the enactment of Ministerial Regulation No. 1 of 2025 strengthens the technical governance of blue carbon as a mitigation instrument and economic asset. The study concludes that Indonesia has built a responsive legal foundation by integrating the Economic Value of Carbon into marine environmental protection. The implementation of MRV mechanisms and emissions certification demonstrates the state responsibility to fulfill international commitments. This legal harmonization is a prerequisite for slowing marine ecosystem degradation, safeguarding marine biodiversity, supporting food security for coastal communities, and advancing intergenerational environmental justice.  Nevertheless, consistency between economic acceleration and ecosystem integrity remains necessary to ensure sustainable marine conservation.

References

1. Adamo N, Al-Ansari N, Sissakian V. Review of climate change impacts on human environment: past, present and future projections. Engineering [Internet]. 2021;13(11):605–30. Available from: http://openaccess.journals4promo.com/id/eprint/1158/

2. Vinata RT, Kumala MT, Setyowati PJ. Blue carbon ecosystems for climate resilience in Indonesia: A study of adaptation strategy. Environ Policy Law [Internet]. 2024;54(1):43–51. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3233/EPL-230049

3. Dina S, Vinata RT. Blue carbon: role of sea to the balance of climate within the mitigation frame of climate change. In: 1st International Conference Postgraduate School Universitas Airlangga:" Implementation of Climate Change Agreement to Meet Sustainable Development Goals"(ICPSUAS 2017) [Internet]. Atlantis Press; 2017. p. 149–52. Available from: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icpsuas-17/25891271

4. Vinata RT, Kumala MT, Serfiyani CY. Climate change and reconstruction of Indonesia’s geographic basepoints: Reconfiguration of baselines and Indonesian Archipelagic Sea lanes. Mar Policy. 2023;148:105443.

5. Lupin D, Nekura R. An advisory opinion on human rights and climate change in the African regional human rights system. In: The Role of Advisory Opinions in International Law in the Context of the Climate Crisis [Internet]. Brill Nijhoff; 2024. p. 142–71. Available from: https://brill.com/edcollchap-oa/book/9789004730618/BP000016.xml

6. McMenamin R. Advisory Opinion on obligations of States in respect of climate change: Potential contribution of Human Rights Bodies. Clim Law [Internet]. 2023;13(3–4):213–23. Available from: https://brill.com/view/journals/clla/13/3-4/article-p213_004.xml

7. Bruhwiler L, Basu S, Butler JH, Chatterjee A, Dlugokencky E, Kenney MA, et al. Observations of greenhouse gases as climate indicators. Clim Change. 2021;165(1):12.

8. Vinata R, Pohan IA. The Significance of State Practises in Enforcing the Principle of Effectiveness in Claims of Territorial Ownership. Justitia J Huk [Internet]. 2023;7(2). Available from: https://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/Justitia/article/view/20410

9. Kusuma ADE, Putra AK. The role of UNCLOS 1982 in maintaining and protecting the international marine environment. Lampung J Int Law. 2024;6(1):23–38.

10. Shelton D. Protection of the Marine Environment. In: International Environmental Law, Fourth Edition [Internet]. Brill Nijhoff; 2025. p. 599–665. Available from: https://brill.com/edcollchap/book/9789047440802/BP000025.xml

11. Malaihollo M. Due diligence in international environmental law and international human rights law: a comparative legal study of the nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement and positive obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Netherlands Int Law Rev [Internet]. 2021;68(1):121–55. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40802-021-00188-5

12. Garg A. Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources: An Analysis. Issue 1 Int’l JL Mgmt Human [Internet]. 2021;4:624. Available from: https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/ijlmhs9&section=52

13. Wang J, Tang R. ITLOS’Interpretation on the Applicability of Article 194 (2) of UNCLOS to Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Chinese J Int Law [Internet]. 2025;24(2):jmaf013. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article-abstract/24/2/jmaf013/8111598

14. Hassan AM, Tawfeeq SN. The role of the United Nations in mitigating global climate change. Russ Law J. 2023;11(9S):521–36.

15. Nyirenda H. Fiddling at the conference of the parties? Peeping into the highs and lows of the post-Kyoto climate change conferences: a review on contexts, decisions and implementation highlights. Environ Dev Sustain. 2025;27(4):8155–85.

16. Dong F, Wang Y, Su B, Hua Y, Zhang Y. The process of peak CO2 emissions in developed economies: A perspective of industrialization and urbanization. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;141:61–75.

17. Huffman A, Reynolds D. The Fight for 1.5 Degrees: Legal Implications of the Global Stocktake for Transitioning away from Fossil Fuel Production. Environs Env’t L Pol’y J. 2024;48:108.

18. Wardhana DHA, Prawira MR. The Analysis of Indonesia’s Climate Change Policies in Response to the 2021 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report/AR6 Group 1 (2021-2023). Proirofonic [Internet]. 2024;1(1):42–53. Available from: https://proirofonic.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/proirofonic/article/view/8

19. Vinata RT, Pohan IA. Human Rights Guarantees for the Protection of Indigenous Peoples as Climate Change Refugees in Indonesia. Int J Policy Stud [Internet]. 2024;4(1):41–55. Available from: https://ijpstudies.com/index.php/ijps/article/view/58

20. Nappoe JAE, Vinata RT. Legal Efforts of the Indonesian Government for the Protection of Marine Resources Due to Damage to Marine Ecosystems by Fishermen. Int J Curr Sci Res Rev. 2024;7(06).

21. Woo J, Fatima R, Kibert CJ, Newman RE, Tian Y, Srinivasan RS. Applying blockchain technology for building energy performance measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) and the carbon credit market: A review of the literature. Build Environ [Internet]. 2021;205:108199. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132321006004

22. Singh N, Finnegan J, Levin K, Rich D, Sotos M, Tirpak D, et al. MRV 101: Understanding measurement, reporting, and verification of climate change mitigation. World Resour Inst [Internet]. 2016;4–5. Available from: https://ledsgp.org/app/uploads/2016/09/Understanding-measuring-reporting-and-verification-of-climate-change.pdf

23. Batjes NH, Ceschia E, Heuvelink GBM, Demenois J, Le Maire G, Cardinael R, et al. Towards a modular, multi-ecosystem monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) framework for soil organic carbon stock change assessment. Carbon Management [Internet]. 2024;15(1):2410812. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17583004.2024.2410812%4010.1080/tfocoll.2024.0.issue-soil-organic-carbon

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

Rimbawati, D. R., & Vinata , R. T. (2026). Legal Analysis of Marine Environmental Protection from Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Asian Journal of Environmental Research, 3(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.69930/ajer.v3i1.679

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.