Environmental Health Risk Analysis of Exposure Carbon Monoxide (CO) on Traders in Manado City Self-Service Jumbo Area

Authors

  • Daniel Y Sualang Faculty of Public Health, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
  • Oksfriani Jufri Sumampouw Faculty of Public Health, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
  • Ricky C Sondakh Faculty of Public Health, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69930/ajer.v3i1.619

Keywords:

Environmental Health Risk Analysis; Carbon Monoxide; Traders; Jumbo Self-Serving; Non-Carcinogenic Risks

Abstract

Background: Motor vehicle activity in shopping mall areas is a primary source of carbon monoxide (CO) emissions, posing a potential long-term health risk for workers with sustained exposure. This study aimed to conduct an environmental health risk assessment of CO exposure for traders operating in the Jumbo Supermarket Area of Manado City. Methods: An observational study with a quantitative approach was conducted in July-August 2025. Ambient air CO concentration was measured in real-time using a CO meter at three location points, with purposive sampling of 30 traders. Respondent characteristics, including exposure parameters, were collected via questionnaire. Health risk analysis was performed by calculating the Average Daily Dose (ADD) and Risk Quotient (RQ), following the US EPA (2022) guidelines, where an RQ > 1 indicates an unacceptable non-carcinogenic risk. Results: The mean ambient CO concentration was 1,591.89 µg/m³, which is significantly below the national air quality standard (10,000 µg/m³) set by Indonesian Minister of Health Regulation No. 02 of 2023. The risk assessment yielded average RQ values of 8.38 x 10⁻⁵ for real-time exposure and 1.23 x 10⁻⁵ for lifetime exposure. All calculated RQ values were substantially below the safety threshold of 1. Conclusion: Current CO concentrations in the study area do not exceed regulatory standards and do not pose an unacceptable non-carcinogenic health risk to traders. However, implementing periodic air quality monitoring is recommended to ensure the continued protection of worker health in this environment.

References

1. World Health Organization. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: WHO Press; 2021.

2. Badan Pusat Statistik. Statistik kendaraan bermotor Indonesia. Jakarta: BPS; 2020.

3. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. Indeks kualitas udara Indonesia. Jakarta: KLHK; n.d.

4. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jumlah kendaraan bermotor menurut kabupaten/kota dan jenis kendaraan di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara tahun 2023. Manado: BPS Sulut; 2024.

5. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I: human health evaluation manual (Part A). Washington DC: US EPA; 2022.

6. Pratiwi NA, Syahrani R, Wulandari S. Paparan NO₂ dan CO di lingkungan pasar tradisional: studi kasus di Jakarta. J Ilmu Lingkungan. 2020;18(1):45–52.

7. Hidayat R, Susanto H, Lestari D. Analisis risiko kesehatan paparan karbon monoksida (CO) di pasar tradisional Surabaya. J Kesehat Lingkung. 2022;18(2):123–31.

8. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2021 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

9. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 tentang Standar Kualitas Udara Ambien.

10. Jusuf H, Prasetya E, Igirisa N. Analisis risiko kesehatan lingkungan pajanan PM10 dan CO pada masyarakat Desa Buata. J Sulolipu. 2023;23(1):1–10.

11. Mentari SAFB, Firdani F, Rahmah SP. Analisis risiko pajanan gas karbon monoksida (CO) pada pedagang Pasar Bandar Buat Kota Padang. J K3L. 2021;2(2):1–10.

12. Anggelina YK, Amalia N, Anggraini FJ, Rodhiyah R. Analisis risiko pajanan karbon monoksida (CO) terhadap pedagang pasar tradisional Kota Jambi. J Tek Lingkung. 2022;11(2):123–34.

13. Juhanda WOR, Tosepu R, Yasin A. Analisis risiko kesehatan lingkungan akibat pajanan CO pada pedagang Pasar Anduonohu. J Penelit Kedokt Kesehat. 2024;1(1):1–12.

14. Putri DA, et al. Analisis risiko kesehatan lingkungan pajanan CO pada pedagang sate. J Kesehat Komunitas. 2022;8(2):123–34.

15. Zahra RH, Budiyono B, Nurjazuli N. Paparan karbon monoksida dan gangguan tekanan darah. J Kesehat Lingkung. 2021;18(1):97–110.

16. Hidayatulloh R, Susanto A, Mulyani T. Analisis risiko pajanan CO pada pedagang Pasar Cikutra Bandung. Varians J Kesmas. 2025;3(1):1–10.

17. Rahman A. Prinsip-prinsip dasar analisis risiko kesehatan lingkungan. Depok: FKM UI; 2005.

18. Sumampouw OJ, Mantow T. Kualitas udara ambien karbon monoksida di Terminal Paal Dua Kota Manado. Sam Ratulangi J Public Health. 2024;5(1):1–12.

19. Chen Z, et al. Health effects of exposure to sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and carbon monoxide: a systematic review. Indoor Air. 2022;32(11):e13170.

20. Guo X, et al. Short-term exposure to ambient CO and mortality in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29:35707–22.

21. Williams S, et al. Characterising carbon monoxide exposure and health impacts: a rapid review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025;22(1):110.

22. Sumampouw, O. J., & Nelwan, J. E. (2024). Dasar Kesehatan Lingkungan Konsep Dasar Dan Pencemaran Lingkungan. Deepublish.

23. Mandjurungi, N., Sumampouw, O. J., & Sondakh, R. C. (2025). Mapping of Environmental Health Risks Due to Carbon Monoxide (CO) Exposure Among Traders at Bersehati Market in Manado City. International Journal of Natural and Health Sciences, 3(4), 263-262.

24. Pangerapan, S. B., Sumampouw, O. J., & Joseph, W. B. S. (2018). Analisis kadar karbon monoksida (CO) udara di terminal Beriman kota Tomohon tahun 2018. KESMAS: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 7(3).

25. Sumampouw, O. J. (2020). Perubahan Iklim dan kesehatan masyarakat. Deepublish.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

Sualang, D. Y., Sumampouw, O. J., & Sondakh, R. C. (2026). Environmental Health Risk Analysis of Exposure Carbon Monoxide (CO) on Traders in Manado City Self-Service Jumbo Area. Asian Journal of Environmental Research, 3(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.69930/ajer.v3i1.619

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.